We shall be in serious trouble, if we do not take seriously the fact that we are constructing the new physical and intellectual environments that will be inhabited by future generations. The information revolution-whether understood as a third one, in terms of wealth creation, or as a fourth one, in terms of a reconceptualization of ourselves-is no less dramatic. Previous revolutions in the creation of wealth, especially the agricultural and the industrial ones, led to macroscopic transformations in our social and political structures and architectural environments, often without much foresight, normally with deep conceptual and ethical implications. > ICTs are creating the new informational environment in which future generations will live most of their time. Legally manufacture unserialized AR-15's in the comfort and privacy of your home. > No prior CNC knowledge or experience is required to manufacture from design files. > What we did as a speech act, as a template of thought and even the legal prescience that might come of it, they have so much more gravity than what might happen to me # The Monopoly and Regulation of Violence > The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Joshua Citarella, _Politigram and the Post-Left_ The network itself works to individuate and isolate everyone each user is an island. > It seems that the end trajectory for every type of online radical is ultimately “the black pill”. It empowers people to break the local bonds of their majoritarian normative systems and decide for themselves which laws are moral and which are bullshit. > Crypto anarchy effectively allows people to pick and choose which laws they support, at least in cyberspatial contexts. The easier it is to generate social movements, the more fragile they become Internet applications have many different applications The web was premised upon freely available information, that didn't scale # Communication Technology and Social Mobilisation These techniques pose particular problems for democracies that seek to preserve free speech while also combating disinformation We are still only beginning to understand the social and political impact of near-zero cost digital communications technologiesĭigital communications networks have transformed older practices of information warfare, covert action, and disinformation How and why do states exploit free speech for political purposes? How does free speech online lead to new, or transformed, national security problems? The results were not pretty, but a new meme was born.Class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide But he agreed, letting Fallon have his way with him. More than at any time since he began running for president, Trump looked truly horrified. “Could I mess your hair up?” Fallon asked by way of concluding. The candidate seemed to almost get teary, before reverting to his usual instincts and saying that he wanted to buy it. The most groan-worthy moment came when Fallon, in yet another example of his hard-hitting style, showed Trump a picture of his childhood home, which is currently for sale, and asked him if he had any fond memories of growing up there. On the other hand, it was hard to tell if the candidate was truly joking when he seemed to suggest, in response to a question about his propensity for eating fast food, that he preferred to eat in chains like McDonald’s or Wendy’s because there was less chance that he’d be poisoned. Trump got off a good one when Fallon, trying to be clever, asked him, “Have you ever played the board game Sorry?” “I sort of like Monopoly better,” Trump replied. Of course, Lester Holt is already scheduled to moderate the first debate, but it’s safe to say that Trump will mostly ignore him. Trump also said that he was in favor of having no moderators in his upcoming debates with Hillary Clinton, citing the Lincoln/Douglas debates as a model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |